Bug#258043: status update
On Thu, 2005-09-29 at 11:20 +0900, Horms wrote:
> Sure, though you might want to make some scope for other patches,
> as I know they creep in from time to time. For instance, sometimes
> we end up with security patches that are missing upstream, of corse
> we submit them, and they usually get incoporated.
Good idea. Do you think this statement is properly scoped?
This source closely tracks official linux kernel releases.
Modifications to that source consist of security fixes, bug fixes, and
features that have already been accepted by the upstream maintainers, or
are changes we believe will be accepted upstream in some form.
The "in some form" is kinda hand-wavy - but I couldn't think of better
wording - suggestions welcome.
If this sounds ok, (and since there is no other pending feedback), I'll
plan to make this change to the Description and close this bug.
Reply to: