Bug#328324: please build powerpc64 kernel with tg3 support
On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 06:34:06PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 08:59:52AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 15, 2005 at 01:03:07PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > > Unless there are technical problems, for instance, tg3 oopses
> > > all the time on arm (i made that up), it should either be on
> > > or off uniformly for all achitecturs. The licencing battle
> > > should be done at the source level - if its in our tree
> > > then its fair game to be turned on.
> >
> > Oh, so you mean it is only off because of the split-config bug you mentioned
> > earlier ?
>
> No that is not what I mean at all.
>
> What I mean is:
> It should either be on or off for all achitectures.
> The only exception should be if it is broken on a particular
> architecture.
What i was saying, is that someone probably used it to turn it on for all, and
powerpc was missed due to the split-config bug, but then maybe i am wrong,
anyway, go ahead and enable it.
> And:
> If, from a licencing point of view, it can be included in the
> source that we ship, then it can be provided as a binary module.
> If the licencing is such that we can't provide a module,
> we should move it into the nonfree package (which probably
> doesn't exist in the archive yet).
Indeed, but Andres has reenabled it in the main packages, so ...
> Problems with split-config are tangential, they affect managing
> the config, but not what the config should look like.
Euh ...
Friendly,
Sven Luther
Reply to: