Bug#324202: include ReiserFS ACL support in 2.6.12 kernel
On 08/30/05 06:29:02PM +0200, David Madore wrote:
> On Tue, Aug 30, 2005 at 01:20:37PM +0900, Horms wrote:
> > Appart from my general feeling that no one should use Reiser FS,
>
> Why is that? I mean, certainly every filesystem has its problems, but
> I don't think there's a consensus that ReiserFS is much worse than the
> others? I personally find it useful because it doesn't have any
> limitation on the number of inodes.
Every encounter I've had with reiserfs has ended in frustration, it's just
not worth fighting with it when there are other filesystems that are much
more reliable with much better userland tools like XFS.
Jim.
Reply to: