[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#324550: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686: install fails with "cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory"



Package: linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Version: 2.6.12-5
Severity: important


sena:~# apt-get -V install linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
Reading Package Lists... Done
Building Dependency Tree... Done
Suggested packages:
   lilo (22.6.1-6.2)
The following NEW packages will be installed:
   linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 (2.6.12-5)
0 upgraded, 1 newly installed, 0 to remove and 938 not upgraded.
Need to get 0B/16.7MB of archives.
After unpacking 46.9MB of additional disk space will be used.
Selecting previously deselected package linux-image-2.6.12-1-686.
(Reading database ... 173388 files and directories currently installed.)
Unpacking linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 (from .../linux-image-2.6.12-1-686_2.6.12-5_i386.deb) ...
Setting up linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 (2.6.12-5) ...
cp: cannot stat `(0xffffe000)': No such file or directory
run-parts: /usr/share/initrd-tools/scripts/e2fsprogs exited with return code 1
Failed to create initrd image.
dpkg: error processing linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 (--configure):
 subprocess post-installation script returned error exit status 9
Errors were encountered while processing:
 linux-image-2.6.12-1-686
E: Sub-process /usr/bin/dpkg returned an error code (1)


-- System Information:
Debian Release: testing/unstable
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'stable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Shell:  /bin/sh linked to /bin/bash
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11-1-686
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1) (ignored: LC_ALL set to en_US)

Versions of packages linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 depends on:
ii  coreutils [fileutils]        5.0.91-2    The GNU core utilities
ii  initrd-tools                 0.1.82      tools to create initrd image for p
ii  module-init-tools            3.0-pre10-4 tools for managing Linux kernel mo

linux-image-2.6.12-1-686 recommends no packages.

-- no debconf information



Reply to: