[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: CAN-2005-2555: 2.6.x does not properly restrict socket policy access to users with the CAP_NET_ADMIN capability



-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Horms,

> Thanks as always.

Thanks to you for the quick reply!

> I have added [X] to SVN.
> - In the linux-2.6 directory in trunk
>   *This should appear in linux-2.6  2.6.12-6 in unstable.

Noted.

> - In the linux-2.6-devel (perhaps renamed linux-2.6-experimental by now)
>   directory
> - The sarge-security 2.6.8 branch
>   * It should appear in kernel-source-2.6.8 2.6.8-16sarge2 in sarge-security
>     (still working on how the security and kernel team can do this)

Noted.

> - The sarge 2.6.8 branch

Does this appear anywhere as a package in unstable? I know that 2.6.8 is
being requested for removal, but why add it to this branch if its never
going to be used?

> - The sarge-security 2.4.27 branch
>   * It should appear in kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-10sarge2 in sarge-security
>     (again, still working on how the security and kernel team can do this)

Noted.

> - The 2.4.27 directory in trunk
>   * This should appear as kernel-source-2.4.27 2.6.12-12 in unstable

This one doesn't look right, I assume you mean to say
"kernel-source-2.4.27 2.4.27-12 in unstable"?

> Man, thats too many branches to be adding stuff to.
> Need to do something about that.

No kidding!

Is it me just paying more attention to kernel security things, or are
there just a significant number of kernel security holes now days?

micah
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFDCeRU9n4qXRzy1ioRAgckAKC0Q2nB4LzNvG8gZqQLcG7UbMO2ZQCcCkIA
SsXxNpO3xW7opqMtb2rBCTs=
=yFzZ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----



Reply to: