Re: 2.6.12 in volatile?

[Sven Luther <sven.luther@wanadoo.fr>]

On Tue, Aug 09, 2005 at 10:43:22AM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> So, was there any decision whether to provide 2.6.8+security in
> volatile, or just backport linux-2.6 (2.6.12)?  I need to do a 2.6.12
> backport, so if people are wanting 2.6.12 for volatile, I'll do that;
> however, if people want 2.6.8+security in volatile, I'll just put 2.6.12
> in p.d.o/~dilinger, and make it known via apt-get.org.
> 
> I've had reports of breakage with 2.6.12 and sarge which I believe are
> related to udev, so we might need to keep that updated as well.  There
> is also some breakage with powerpc and older versions of kernel-package;
> we'd need to determine what's necessary for that (my tests on i386 w/
> 2.6.12-1 went just fine w/ the kernel-package that's in sarge).

We need to backport kernel-package too, or i can submit a patch against the
kernel-patch in sarge ?

Friendly,

Sven Luther