Re: [shorty: Re: 2.6.12 debian powerpc kernels and ppc64 ...]
On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 10:39:05PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> The first try to send the message below didn't work. Hoping it does
> now ... :)
> ----- Forwarded message from Wolfgang Pfeiifer -----
> To: Sven Luther <email@example.com>
> Cc: firstname.lastname@example.org, email@example.com,
> Subject: Re: 2.6.12 debian powerpc kernels and ppc64 ...
> Date: Mon, 18 Jul 2005 22:17:37 +0200
> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
> X-URL: http://www.wolfgangpfeiffer.com
> On Mon, Jul 18, 2005 at 07:23:05AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 17, 2005 at 07:52:30PM +0200, Wolfgang Pfeiffer wrote:
> > > Hi Sven
> > >
> > > On Fri, Jul 15, 2005 at 11:04:17PM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> > > > Hello,
> > > >
> > > > I would like testers who want to test new powerpc kernels on ppc64 machines :
> > > >
> > > > These i have uploaded here :
> > > >
> > > > http://people.debian.org/~luther/ppc64/kernel-image-2.6.12-sven_1_powerpc.deb
> > >
> > > At least the latter one works here. Or at least it boots here without any probs,
> > > as it seems .. :
> > >
> > > $ uname -a
> > > Linux debby 2.6.12-sven #1 Fri Jul 15 13:44:26 UTC 2005 ppc GNU/Linux
> > >
> > > $ cat /proc/cpuinfo
> > > processor : 0
> > > cpu : 7455, altivec supported
> > > clock : 867MHz
> > > revision : 0.2 (pvr 8001 0302)
> > > bogomips : 865.18
> > > machine : PowerBook3,5
> > > motherboard : PowerBook3,5 MacRISC2 MacRISC Power Macintosh
> > > detected as : 80 (PowerBook Titanium IV)
> > > pmac flags : 0000001b
> > > L2 cache : 256K unified
> > > memory : 768MB
> > > pmac-generation : NewWorld
> > As was expectet, the 64bit is the one i am not sure about.
> > > But how come this kernel still does not have the necessary patches
> > > applied to run kismet:
> > Please provide a bug report with this info,
> No. Please see:
> As you can see I sent them a bug report once. It won't happen again in
> the foreseeable future.
Send a bug report to the debian kernel package i meant, not upstream, altough
ther policy is to follow upstream on this, there may be exceptions.
The debian kernel maintainer is a team, not just me, and sending personal mail
and nort an archived bug report, is bound to get lost in my (huge) inbox,
especially now that i am mostly offline 2 weeks.
> that page nobody seemed to be interested in the problem. IIRC I could
> not compile for weeks or perhaps even months a new 2.4 kernel version
> because of the mentioned errors.
2.4 is dead on desktop powerpc for over a year and a half now, so ...
> > i will apply as soon as i am back
> > in 2 weeks, if someone from the kernel team doesn't beat me to it.
> The site for the patch I used, IIRC:
> wget http://www.kismetwireless.net/code/orinoco-2.6.12-rfmon-dragorn-1.diff
> The md5sum for the latter that I have here is
> So if yours will be different you can let me know.
Nice , but please apply this info to a debian bug report (reportbug kernel on
a running debian system).
> And I applied the patch to 2.6.12. Or better: I probably patched a
> 2.6.11 (tarball) source with patch-2.6.12.bz2, and then applied the
> above orinoco patch. (Uncertainty because it's already a few weeks ago
> I compiled this kernel ... )
> And just in case it might help someone else:
> The following snippet might serve as an example of how to compile this
> more or less wifi ready patched source [Please check for yourself in
> case I made any mistakes ... :) ... ]:
> tar xzvf linux-2.6.11.tar.gz
> cd linux-2.6.11/
> bzip2 -cd /path/to/patch-2.6.12.bz2 | patch -p1
> [then applying the orinoco patch from above]
> cp /boot/someconfig .
> make oldconfig
> fakeroot make-kpkg clean
> time MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-4.0" fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version=-somename --revision +anothername kernel_image
> time MAKEFLAGS="CC=gcc-4.0" fakeroot make-kpkg --append-to-version=+orinoco-patched --revision +050703 kernel_image
> Thanks for responding, Sven ... and yes: for your work, too :)
> And sorry for refusing to play nice if things run ugly ..
Well, just provide a debian bug report so we can continue having this
conversation the right way.
TW, is this a different patch than the one Jens had applied back them in the
2.6.4 debian powerpc kenrel days ? And which was removed for bugginess or