[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#317756: 2.6.12 testers wanted



Jurij Smakov <jurij@wooyd.org> writes:

> Thanks for testing. Can you try tweaking you X configuration file as
> described in http://forums.gentoo.org/viewtopic-t-288023.html, and see
> if it helps in any way with the mouse problem?

The only difference between the mouse section given there and mine is
that the one I'm using under 2.6.8 has the extra lines:

	Option		"Emulate3Buttons"	"true"
	Option		"ZAxisMapping"		"4 5"

I'll try taking them out for next time I boot, but the gentoo config
seems to be with x.org, not the debian stable server.  The kernel
mouse messages look the same as for 2.6.8.  It's a USB mouse, of
course.

> Garbled screen in console sounds like framebuffer problems.

Yes, it's after it (I assume) switches to the framebuffer, as I should
have made clear.

> What videocard are you using?

It's (I assume) the normal one for blade 100.  lspci says

0000:00:13.0 VGA compatible controller: ATI Technologies Inc Rage XL (rev 27)

I should have thought to paste them before, but the relevant (?)
kernel messages for 2.6.12 are:

  atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33MHz) [0x4752 rev 0x27]
  atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230 MH z PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK
  Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x64
  atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI

and 2.6.11:

  atyfb: 3D RAGE XL (Mach64 GR, PCI-33MHz) [0x4752 rev 0x27]
  atyfb: 8M SDRAM (1:1), 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230 MH z PLL, 83 Mhz MCLK, 63 MHz XCLK
  atyfb: setting up CRTC
  atyfb: set primary CRT to 1280x1024 NN composite N
  atyfb: CRTC_H_TOTAL_DISP: 9f00d2
  atyfb: CRTC_H_SYNC_STRT_WID: 3201a3
  atyfb: CRTC_V_TOTAL_DISP: 3ff0429
  atyfb: CRTC_V_SYNC_STRT_WID: 230400
  atyfb: CRTC_OFF_PITCH: 28000000
  atyfb: CRTC_VLINE_CRNT_VLINE: 0
  atyfb: CRTC_GEN_CNTL: b000200
  atyfb: atyfb_set_par
  atyfb:  Set Visible Mode to 1280x1024-8
  atyfb:  Virtual resolution 1280x6521, pixclock_in_ps 7444 (calculated 7444)
  atyfb:  Dot clock:           134 MHz
  atyfb:  Horizontal sync:     79 kHz
  atyfb:  Vertical refresh:    74 Hz
  atyfb:  x  style: 134.2504 1280 1313 1457 1688 1024 1025 1028 1066
  atyfb:  fb style: 7444  231 1280 33 144 38 1024 1 3
  debug atyfb: Mach64 non-shadow register values:
  debug atyfb: 0x2000:  009F00D2 003201A3 03FF0429 00230400
  debug atyfb: 0x2010:  018B0000 28000000 08000040 0B002200
  debug atyfb: 0x2020:  002A0776 02400731 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x2030:  00000000 00110202 00000000 0000C001
  debug atyfb: 0x2040:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x2050:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x2060:  00000000 FFFFFF0F 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x2070:  00000000 00000000 01003200 00050000
  debug atyfb: 0x2080:  00000001 00000000 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x2090:  00803000 00000000 00000100 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x20A0:  7B23A040 00000104 00000000 E5000C81
  debug atyfb: 0x20B0:  10151A3B 00010000 00010000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x20C0:  00FF0000 86010182 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x20D0:  00000100 00080179 00000000 000000C2
  debug atyfb: 0x20E0:  27004752 0040001C 00000000 00000000
  debug atyfb: 0x20F0:  00000000 00008021 037FFCF8 00000000
  
  debug atyfb: Mach64 PLL register values:
  debug atyfb: 0x00:  ADD541E4 8A030094 8E9E6501 80 1B0000
  debug atyfb: 0x10:  06CF4000 50B6AC10 408024FD 00 000002
  debug atyfb: 0x20:  06AC06AC 1424FD00 00255500 00 000000
  debug atyfb: 0x30:  00000000 00000000 00000000 00 000000
  
  Console: switching to colour frame buffer device 160x64
  atyfb: fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI
  

2.6.8 (which is OK) says this.  Is the different MCLK the problem?

  atyfb: 3D RAGE (XL) [0x4752 rev 0x27] 8M SDRAM, 29.498928 MHz XTAL, 230 MHz PLL, 100 Mhz MCLK
  fb0: ATY Mach64 frame buffer device on PCI

> Did you try disabling the framebuffer?

How?  I'm afraid I don't understand framebuffer stuff and doc on
kernel parameters is rather deficient...  I probably wouldn't care
much about the console anyway if the mouse was working.



Reply to: