Re: renaming linux-kernel source package
Goswin von Brederlow writes...
> Matt Taggart <firstname.lastname@example.org> writes:
> > I really like the proposal other than that, but is there a way to keep a
> > limited set of older stuff around longer? Sort of analogous to the "oldlibs
> > idea. Maybe the package can split off older versions of itself, with more
> > descriptive names, as it moves forward. Or something like that...
You didn't read the part of my message where I said that snapshot.d.n
wasn't acceptable. Of course this is just my opinion.
Maybe if snapshot was an official debian.org service and publicly
mirrored it might be ok?