On Sun, 2005-07-10 at 16:48 +0200, maximilian attems wrote: > On Sun, 10 Jul 2005, Andres Salomon wrote: > > > > > I'm going to suggest renaming our 2.6.12 source package from > > linux-kernel-2.6.12 to linux-kernel-2.6. Thoughts? Dann Frazier and I > > have discussed this on IRC a little bit, and come up w/ the following > > points.. > > > > * Source: linux-kernel-2.6, Version: 2.6.12-1 > why not linux-2.6? > that matches upstream name. > *shrug*. Either works for me (what do people prefer?). The point is to drop the sublevel, to make life easier. Just talked to joeyh, as well; he doesn't seem to think there'd be any d-i related problems by doing it. -- Andres Salomon <dilinger@debian.org>
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part