Bug#282758: marked as done (Consider adding inotify patch)
Your message dated Tue, 31 May 2005 23:34:44 +0200
with message-id <20050531213444.GJ4967@sputnik.stro.at>
and subject line Bug#282758: inotify review
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere. Please contact me immediately.)
Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)
--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 24 Nov 2004 09:49:58 +0000
>From ross@burtonini.com Wed Nov 24 01:49:57 2004
Return-path: <ross@burtonini.com>
Received: from smtp.nildram.co.uk [195.112.4.54]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1CWtmf-0005Vx-00; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 01:49:57 -0800
Received: from burtonini.com (unknown [84.12.27.219])
by smtp.nildram.co.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id AD13B2545E4
for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:48:50 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from 127.0.0.1 (ident=unknown) by burtonini.com with esmtp
(masqmail 0.2.20) id 1CWtkI-1uF-00 for <submit@bugs.debian.org>; Wed,
24 Nov 2004 09:47:30 +0000
Subject: Consider adding inotify patch
From: Ross Burton <ross@burtonini.com>
To: submit@bugs.debian.org
Content-Type: text/plain
Date: Wed, 24 Nov 2004 09:47:30 +0000
Message-Id: <1101289650.6989.2.camel@localhost>
Mime-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Evolution 2.0.2
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-8.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2004_03_25
X-Spam-Level:
Package: kernel-image-2.6.9
Version: 2.6.9-2
Severity: wishlist
Please consider applying the inotify patches from here:
http://www.kernel.org/pub/linux/kernel/people/rml/inotify/v2.6/
This is a re-working of the dnotify API which doesn't suck, and is very
useful. It should be entering the kernel at some point but the more
testing it gets, the better.
Thanks,
Ross
--
Ross Burton mail: ross@burtonini.com
jabber: ross@burtonini.com
www: http://www.burtonini.com./
PGP Fingerprint: 1A21 F5B0 D8D0 CFE3 81D4 E25A 2D09 E447 D0B4 33DF
---------------------------------------
Received: (at 282758-done) by bugs.debian.org; 31 May 2005 21:34:46 +0000
>From max@stro.at Tue May 31 14:34:46 2005
Return-path: <max@stro.at>
Received: from baikonur.stro.at [213.239.196.228]
by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
id 1DdENq-0001yt-00; Tue, 31 May 2005 14:34:46 -0700
Received: from sputnik (stallburg.stro.at [128.131.216.190])
by baikonur.stro.at (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2687B5C014
for <282758-done@bugs.debian.org>; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:34:42 +0200 (CEST)
Received: from max by sputnik with local (Exim 4.50)
id 1DdENo-0007N7-Lt
for 282758-done@bugs.debian.org; Tue, 31 May 2005 23:34:44 +0200
Date: Tue, 31 May 2005 23:34:44 +0200
From: maximilian attems <debian@sternwelten.at>
To: 282758-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#282758: inotify review
Message-ID: <20050531213444.GJ4967@sputnik.stro.at>
References: <[🔎] 5a2cf1f605053101233b9b0be4@mail.gmail.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] 5a2cf1f605053101233b9b0be4@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.9i
X-Virus-Scanned: by Amavis (ClamAV) at stro.at
Delivered-To: 282758-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.5 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_10,HAS_BUG_NUMBER
autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level:
On Tue, 31 May 2005, jerome lacoste wrote:
> Christoph,
>
> On Tue, 2004-11-30 at 20:58 +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I doubt it;ll get there or at least stay there long unless it gets
> > largely rewritten.
>
> inotify is getting stable and has had many changes since your comment.
> Do you still think your comment applies?
intofiy prooved to be still very racy in the last reviews.
the rework doesn't seem profund enough from the eyes of the vfs
maintainers.
accroding to our policy
-> http://wiki.debian.net/?DebianKernelPatchAcceptanceGuidelines
i close that bug.
anyway have fun with your dog.
--
maks
Reply to: