[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#251156: initrd-tools: getting /dev2/root2 in /proc/mounts



On Sun, 01 May 2005, Stepan Koltsov wrote:

> Thanks for you reply.

np, thanks for your quick reply. :)
 
> Error still persist with current initrd-tools. I. e. there is record
> about /dev2/root2 in /proc/mounts, but there is no /dev2.
> 
> Here it is requested info:
> 
> # cat /proc/mounts
> rootfs / rootfs rw 0 0
> /dev2/root2 / ext3 rw 0 0
> devfs /dev devfs rw 0 0
> proc /proc proc rw 0 0
> devpts /dev/pts devpts rw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc0/part3 /usr ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc0/part2 /var ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc2/part2 /mnt/discs/disc2/part2 ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc2/part3 /home ext3 rw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc1/part1 /mnt/discs/disc1/part1 ext3 rw 0 0
> tmp /tmp tmpfs rw 0 0

time to slapd devfs, it's output is _unreadalble_
 
> # cat /etc/fstab | egrep -v '^#' | grep -v '^$'
> /dev/discs/disc0/part5 /     ext3 defaults 0 0
> proc                   /proc proc defaults 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc0/part6 none  swap sw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc0/part3 /usr ext3 defaults                   0 0
> /dev/discs/disc0/part2 /var  ext3 defaults 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc2/part1 none swap sw 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc2/part2 /mnt/discs/disc2/part2 ext3 defaults,usrquota 0 0
> /dev/discs/disc2/part3 /home ext3 defaults,usrquota  0 0
> /dev/discs/disc1/part1 /mnt/discs/disc1/part1 ext3 defaults,usrquota 0 0
> tmp                    /tmp tmpfs defaults 0 0
> 
> # uname -a
> Linux banana.mx1.ru 2.4.25-1-686 #1 Tue Feb 24 10:55:59 EST 2004 i686 GNU/Linux
i can't reporduce your bug with current initrd-tools,
but i'm not mounting devfs.
as your kernel seems old, i must reask if you really use
initrd-tools version > 0.1.78 ??
the output of egrep -i devf /boot/config-2.4.* would be interesting.
also please try with stock debian kernel from sarge if you can
reproduce it?

please tell me any detail about your devfs usage,
so that i could maybe reproduce it.

thanks for your feedback.
 
--
maks




Reply to: