[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Bug#307987: marked as done (kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8: does not depend on newest 2.6 kernel)



Your message dated Sat, 7 May 2005 08:51:34 +0200
with message-id <20050507065134.GS20901@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
and subject line Bug#307987: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8: does not depend on newest 2.6 kernel
has caused the attached Bug report to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what I am
talking about this indicates a serious mail system misconfiguration
somewhere.  Please contact me immediately.)

Debian bug tracking system administrator
(administrator, Debian Bugs database)

--------------------------------------
Received: (at submit) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 03:44:34 +0000
>From evilsporkman@gmail.com Fri May 06 20:44:34 2005
Return-path: <evilsporkman@gmail.com>
Received: from master.debian.org [146.82.138.7] 
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUGF0-0004CB-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 20:44:34 -0700
Received: from pcp05655073pcs.macmb101.mi.comcast.net ([10.0.0.5]) [68.61.74.10] 
	by master.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUGF0-00086k-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 22:44:34 -0500
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Scott Wolchok <evilsporkman@gmail.com>
To: Debian Bug Tracking System <submit@bugs.debian.org>
Subject: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8: does not depend on newest 2.6 kernel
X-Mailer: reportbug 3.11
Date: Fri, 06 May 2005 23:44:33 -0400
X-Debbugs-Cc: evilsporkman@gmail.com
Message-Id: <[🔎] E1DUGF0-00086k-00@master.debian.org>
Delivered-To: submit@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-9.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_PACKAGE,
	OUR_MTA_MSGID,X_DEBBUGS_CC autolearn=ham 
	version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 

Package: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8
Version: 103
Severity: normal

The description of this package states that it "will always depend on
the latest 2.6 kernel image available". However, the current unstable
version depends on kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8, when it should
clearly depend on kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8.


-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Kernel: Linux 2.6.11.8
Locale: LANG=en_US, LC_CTYPE=en_US (charmap=ISO-8859-1)

Versions of packages kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8 depends on:
pn  kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k            Not found.

---------------------------------------
Received: (at 307987-done) by bugs.debian.org; 7 May 2005 06:52:12 +0000
>From freddy@lowpingbastards.de Fri May 06 23:52:12 2005
Return-path: <freddy@lowpingbastards.de>
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de (mail.lowpingbastards.de) [213.178.77.226] (UNKNOWN)
	by spohr.debian.org with esmtp (Exim 3.35 1 (Debian))
	id 1DUJAZ-0007Fp-00; Fri, 06 May 2005 23:52:12 -0700
Received: from defiant.lowpingbastards.de (freddy@localhost.lowpingbastards.de [127.0.0.1])
	by mail.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Debian-1) with ESMTP id j476pfVj017139;
	Sat, 7 May 2005 08:51:41 +0200
Received: (from freddy@localhost)
	by defiant.lowpingbastards.de (8.13.4/8.13.4/Submit) id j476pYxK017138;
	Sat, 7 May 2005 08:51:34 +0200
Date: Sat, 7 May 2005 08:51:34 +0200
From: Frederik Schueler <fs@lowpingbastards.de>
To: Scott Wolchok <evilsporkman@gmail.com>, 307987-done@bugs.debian.org
Subject: Re: Bug#307987: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8: does not depend on newest 2.6 kernel
Message-ID: <20050507065134.GS20901@mail.lowpingbastards.de>
References: <[🔎] E1DUGF0-00086k-00@master.debian.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="+OVWeTxrbAwQuiek"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <[🔎] E1DUGF0-00086k-00@master.debian.org>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6+20040907i
X-Virus-Scanned: by amavisd-new
Delivered-To: 307987-done@bugs.debian.org
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02 
	(1.212-2003-09-23-exp) on spohr.debian.org
X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-6.0 required=4.0 tests=BAYES_00,HAS_BUG_NUMBER 
	autolearn=no version=2.60-bugs.debian.org_2005_01_02
X-Spam-Level: 


--+OVWeTxrbAwQuiek
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Hello,

kernel-latest point of view is sarge currently, and not sid.=20
2.6.8-11-amd64-* are the latest kernels in sarge.

Kind regards
Frederik Schueler

On Fri, May 06, 2005 at 11:44:33PM -0400, Scott Wolchok wrote:
> Package: kernel-image-2.6-amd64-k8
> Version: 103
> Severity: normal
>=20
> The description of this package states that it "will always depend on
> the latest 2.6 kernel image available". However, the current unstable
> version depends on kernel-image-2.6.8-11-amd64-k8, when it should
> clearly depend on kernel-image-2.6.11-9-amd64-k8.

--=20
ENOSIG

--+OVWeTxrbAwQuiek
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: Digital signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.5 (GNU/Linux)

iD8DBQFCfGV26n7So0GVSSARAgQLAJ9rk74VAzQOG5yimZVyzYftvPGYUACfczTt
O6eqh/ESm5MHltVVpcTQJZA=
=2vtr
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--+OVWeTxrbAwQuiek--



Reply to: