Bug#268617: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-k7: cannot 'hdparm -d1 /dev/hda' with 2.4.27-1-k7 kernel which worked with 2.4.26-1-k7
Package: kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-k7
Version: 2.4.27-1
Severity: normal
With the 2.4.26-1-k7 kernel and the via82cxxx modules insmod-ed, I was
able to to 'hdparm -d1 /dev/hda', but with the 2.4.27-1-k7 this no
longers work and fails with a
HDIO_SET_DMA failed: Operation not permitted
which I also had on 2.4.26-1-kt *without* the via82cxxx module.
Some info I hope is usefull:
# lspci
0000:00:00.0 Host bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8377 [KT400/KT600
AGP] Host Bridge
0000:00:01.0 PCI bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 PCI Bridge
0000:00:09.0 Ethernet controller: Broadcom Corporation BCM4401 100Base-T
(rev 01)
0000:00:10.0 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.1 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.2 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT82xxxxx UHCI USB
1.1 Controller (rev 80)
0000:00:10.3 USB Controller: VIA Technologies, Inc. USB 2.0 (rev 82)
0000:00:11.0 ISA bridge: VIA Technologies, Inc. VT8235 ISA Bridge
0000:00:11.1 IDE interface: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT82C586A/B/VT82C686/A/B/VT823x/A/C PIPC Bus Master IDE (rev 06)
0000:00:11.5 Multimedia audio controller: VIA Technologies, Inc.
VT8233/A/8235/8237 AC97 Audio Controller (rev 50)
0000:01:00.0 VGA compatible controller: nVidia Corporation NV11
[GeForce2 MX/MX 400] (rev b2)
For both cases the same hdparm version was used, and only the kernel
version differs.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: 3.1
APT prefers testing
APT policy: (990, 'testing'), (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: i386 (i686)
Kernel: Linux 2.4.26-1-k7
Locale: LANG=C, LC_CTYPE=C
Versions of packages kernel-headers-2.4.27-1-k7 depends on:
ii coreutils [fileutils] 5.2.1-2 The GNU core utilities
ii fileutils 5.2.1-2 The GNU file management utilities
ii kernel-headers-2.4.27-1 2.4.27-1 Header files related to Linux kern
ii hdparm 5.6-0.1 Tune hard disk parameters for high performance
-- no debconf information
Reply to: