[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Reducing the number of kernels



On Thu, Jul 29, 2004 at 10:21:48PM +0200, Andreas Barth wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> the release of sarge is getting nearer. From tomorrow on, a freeze of
> standard+base-packages starts. So, I think it's now the right time to
> reduce the number of kernels. Also, the security team has requested to
> keep the number of different kernels versions as small as possible. And,
> I think it would be nice to really come down to one single kernel
> version.
> 
> This mail contains just suggestions. I'm not the maintainer, and I'm not
> the one to finally decide. But - I think it's now time to do it. Also, I
> can see that the number of different kernel versions have been reduced
> significantly. Thank you all for doing it (and the common repository
> seems to have positive effects ;).
> 
> The main issue is: The uploads of kernels should also be frozen.
> If really some changes are needed, then this should be done now, so that
> freezing can happen ASAP.
> 
> 
> Currently, we have the following kernel versions:
>        alpha  arm  hppa  i386  ia64  m68k  mips  powerpc  s390   sparc
> 2.4.19         P
> 2.4.21                                                    R(*)
> 2.4.24   R
> 2.4.25         R     R     R     R     R    R               R
> 2.4.26   K     K     K     K     K     K    K      *        K      K
> 
> R means remove, K means keep (or at least: newest version currently).
> P means: patch only, should probably be dropped.
> 
> * there is still a udeb for s390/2.4.21 - so, can we really drop it.
> * If I understood it right, Sven suggested to drop 2.4 for powerpc.

There currently is only a 2.4.25 kernel for powerpc, 2.4.26 i am still
struggling with, since there seem to be broken generation of the chrp and prep
zImage files.

apus has 2.4.25, but it is not working anymore, and a return to 2.4.22 may be
a good idea if we want to still support apus.

And finally, no, i don't really want to remove 2.4, but only to make 2.6 the
default kernel. This already happens by default with debian-installer, since
debian-installer now uses and installs the 2.6 kernel for all targets except
the miboot oldworld floppies.

>        alpha  i386  ia64  powerpc
> 2.6.3                 P
> 2.6.4                 R
> 2.6.5    R
> 2.6.6    *      R     R      R
> 2.6.7           K     K      K
> 
> * 2.6.6 is the most current version for alpha. It might be nice to
>   update alpha to 2.6.7 and drop this version.
> 
> 
> For 2.2, the following kernels are still in testing (but all with the
> same version 2.2.25): m68k, sparc.
> 
> 
> So, this proposal boils down to:
> 1. If there is need for another kernel source version for 2.2, 2.4
> and/or 2.6, do it _now_. In this case, please take care that all archs
> manage to catch up. Freeze all main source lines where this is not
> needed.
> 2. Upload alpha/2.6.7.
> 3. Remove the older kernels.
> 
> Comments are appreciated. If wanted, I can file removal requests for the
> older kernels.

Well filling bug for removal is all fine, but they need to be acted upon too.

Friendly,

Sven Luther



Reply to: