Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)
On Wed, Jun 30, 2004 at 07:45:25AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Yeah, but what about 2.6 for powerpc and x86 (and maybe some other who
> is ready) and 2.4 for the rest of it (and 2.2 for some m68k subarches).
> I believe now is the time to take that decision, it may even be too late
> already, given the sarge release schedule, and provided the GR doesn't
> finish in some catastrophic result for the sarge release.
Well, AIUI, d-i should be able to on a per-arch basis default to a 2.6
kernel. So we can have sarge release with a 2.6 kernel by default on
selected architectures. -boot may correct me.
> (Still a bit pissed at the syntactic GR proponent who slyly passed this
> when nobody was noticing)
Yes well, what's done is done. Learn from it.