Re: status of 2.6.7 ? (Was Re: Bug#256763: kernel-image-2.6.6-i386: not ready for sarge just yet)
On Mon, Jun 28, 2004 at 04:10:32PM -0700, William Lee Irwin III wrote:
>> Sounds good. We should move to the 2.6.7 debs ASAP so this should keep
>> the thing out of people's hands until it's removed from the archives.
On Tue, Jun 29, 2004 at 08:46:04AM +0200, Sven Luther wrote:
> Any news on the 2.6.7 debs ? It is again something like 2-3 weeks now
> since they where uploaded, isn't it ?
> Also, what is your opinion on going with 2.6 over 2.4 on certain arches
> by default ? I noticed nobody seemed to care about my mail on the
> subject.
> Friendly,
> Sven Luther
It would be great to move to 2.6 in as many areas as possible. It's the
new stable kernel, and 2.4 is in a deep freeze, so we would make the
best use of maintenance effort that way. I think the only exceptions are
architecture ports not supported and/or working in 2.6 but that need 2.4
or earlier to function. But this can only be a recommendation since I
only have the i386 and alpha packages.
-- wli
Reply to: