On Thu, 2004-06-24 at 09:36, William Lee Irwin III wrote: > On Wed, Jun 23, 2004 at 06:25:34PM -0400, Andres Salomon wrote: > >> FYI, kernel-image-2.6.7-i386 builds fine w/ these kernel sources, as long > >> as CONFIG_SOFTWARE_SUSPEND=y (instead of 'm'; the modular swsusp patch is > >> broken for 2.6.7). If anyone's interested in the actual packages, I can > >> throw them online. > > On Thu, Jun 24, 2004 at 09:57:07AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > Shouldn't we disable swsusp instead? The code is flakey at least and > > eats quite a bit of memory that seems to be scare on the boot floppies. > > I'd be in favor of that also. > > It was mentioned that this may cause complaints that the feature is not > present. I would rather risk that than other failure modes. > > > -- wli If this is flakey upstream (the modular patch should be dropped as well, but that's pretty much decided on at this point), I can disable it.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part