Re: Bug#231538: A possible solution

[Andreas Barth <aba@not.so.argh.org>]

* Herbert Xu (herbert@gondor.apana.org.au) [040302 08:10]:
> On Tue, Mar 02, 2004 at 04:22:30PM +0900, GOTO Masanori wrote:
> > 
> > > Well newer initrd-tools module-init-tools should be in woody 
> > > in order to upgrade to sarge smoothly.

> > Is this ok?  Herbert?  Marco?  If not, I reassign this bug to such
> > packages.
 
> initrd-tools does not depend on glibc so the version in sarge/sid
> should suffice.

But initrd-tools from sarge wants cramfsprogs (>= 1.1-4), dash; both
is not part of woody. I'd propose to use it from backports.org (which
is changed to cramfsprogs (>= 1.1-3), dash|ash; or is there a problem
with that)?

Well, and I'd also propose to take the backport from modutils from the
same source.

However, the kernel package could be taken out of the pool / from
sarge.

@ftpmasters: How should these packages be upload? Just as "byhand",
and you sort it in? And how is the packages-file generated? In which
form do you want to have the README-file for that directory?



Cheers,
Andi
-- 
   http://home.arcor.de/andreas-barth/
   PGP 1024/89FB5CE5  DC F1 85 6D A6 45 9C 0F  3B BE F1 D0 C5 D1 D9 0C