[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 rebuild for Wheezy/Sid

Am Montag, 10. September 2012, 11:46:39 schrieb Martin Steigerwald:
> Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers,
> any chance to upload Digikam 4:2.9.0-2 against libmarblewidet13?
> merkaba:~> LANG=C apt-get -t experimental install digikam
> Reading package lists... Done
> Building dependency tree
> Reading state information... Done
> Some packages could not be installed. This may mean that you have
> requested an impossible situation or if you are using the unstable
> distribution that some required packages have not yet been created
> or been moved out of Incoming.
> The following information may help to resolve the situation:
> The following packages have unmet dependencies:
>  digikam : Depends: libmarblewidget12 (>= 4:4.7.1) but it is not
> installable E: Unable to correct problems, you have held broken
> packages. merkaba:~#100>
> as it is in Wheezy/Sid:
> merkaba:~> rmadison libmarblewidget13
>  libmarblewidget13 | 4:4.8.4-2 | wheezy | amd64, armel, armhf, i386,
> ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390,
> s390x, sparc
>  libmarblewidget13 | 4:4.8.4-2 | sid    | amd64, armel, armhf,
> hurd-i386, i386, ia64, kfreebsd-amd64, kfreebsd-i386, mips, mipsel,
> powerpc, s390, s390x, sparc
> merkaba:~> rmadison libmarblewidget12
> merkaba:~>
> Otherwise I can rebuild locally and upload it somewhere for
> subscribers of this list to try out.
> Current Digikam 4:2.6.0-1+b1 in Wheezy has some serious usability
> issues. It doesn´t update the view on rotating images, renaming
> albums and stuff like that sometimes. I even had a crash. I can try
> to describe a reproducer for the missing GUI updates and do a bug
> report which could serve as one argument to justify a release
> exception if 2.9.0 fixes those issues.
> Many thanks,

Hi Mark, hi Debian Qt/KDE developers, hi Martin,

I'm using a pur sid installation as rolling release on my notebook.
So I have rebuilded the packages against an up to date sid repository 
for my own. Furthermore I have removed, in my own build, the new added 
conflict to the package phonon-backend-vlc because I could not reproduce 
the bug #684130 neither with the 2.7.0 nor 2.9.0 debian package from the 
experimental repository rebuilded for sid.
Tested with the vlc packages from main and from debian-multimedia.org.

Kind regards

Reply to: