Am Freitag 05 März 2010 schrieb Sune Vuorela: > On 2010-03-05, Martin Steigerwald <Martin@lichtvoll.de> wrote: [...] > > If I were to rebuild digikam for KDE 4.4.1 SC, which version string > > should= > > > >=20 > > > > I use? 2:1.1.0-1 as in unstable or 3:1.1.0-1 or what? I just ask in > > case=20 anyone else wanted this, for my local installation I do not > > care that=20 much. > > use currentversion+steigerwald1 or something like that. e.g. > if the version in debian is 1:3.4-4, use 1:3.4-3+steigerwald1 > > then you > a) have it at a higher version than what's currently in the archive and > apt wont try to replace it with what's in the archive > b) have it at a lower version than what's next in the archive, and you > will automatically get a upgrade when possible > c) have it tagged as 'this is my local rebuild' even in the version > string Thanks, Sune. Digikam still works after the update, so thats good enough for now. Hmmm, expect that it crashes on exit. Well may look into this next week. -- Martin 'Helios' Steigerwald - http://www.Lichtvoll.de GPG: 03B0 0D6C 0040 0710 4AFA B82F 991B EAAC A599 84C7
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.