[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: replacement for kpdf for kde 4.X?



I´m a KDE4 fan like you but Okular haven´t convinced to me, I like to view my pdf XPDF for a single reason: Okular yet have many troubles with the rendering of this type of files and I don´t know why.
Regards

----- Mensaje original -----
De: "Arthur Marsh" <arthur.marsh@internode.on.net>
Para: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Enviados: Domingo, 8 de Febrero de 2009 8:53:10 (GMT-0500) Auto-Detected
Asunto: Re: replacement for kpdf for kde 4.X?

Arthur Marsh wrote, on 08/02/09 23:26:
> Hi, I had problems with lack of working help tool-tips and information
> about copying text from encrypted pdfs in kpdf 0.5.9 using kde 3.5.10 in
> Debian unstable (bug #514238) and was told that nothing would be done as
> "KPDF is frozen solid and no more KDE 3 releases are planned, so it
> cannot be done. (And Okular - KPDF successor in KDE 4 - does that, 
> anyway.)"
> 
> However, Okular (at least the version in unstable) is *way* too slow
> compared with kpdf, and when I reinstalled it and attempted to load a 
> pdf via the command line, it crashed (Debian bug #514526). It also 
> crashed when I loaded the same pdf (found at 
> http://www.acma.gov.au/webwr/_assets/main/lib310648/ecs_disc_paper.pdf ) 
> by first loading Okular and then selecting the file from the okular file 
> menu.

The fix to this problem was to run

kbuildsycoca4 --noincremental

as the user.

> 
> I did also report the bug as http://bugs.kde.org/show_bug.cgi?id=183407
> 
> Anyway, I was lead to believe that kde 4.X would not be slower than kde
> 3.5.X.
> 
> What is the best way to achieve a fast, fully-documented pdf reader for
> kde 3.5.X under Debian?
> 
> 
> Arthur.
> 
> 


-- 
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-REQUEST@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org




-- 


""A mí Windows nunca se me ha colgado" 
" 
Pinocho .. 

Marcos Ortiz Valmaseda 
Linux User # 418229 
Debian && OpenSUSE proud user 


Reply to: