Re: KDE 4.2

To: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE 4.2
From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
Date: Tue, 18 Nov 2008 13:27:49 -0600
Message-id: <[🔎] 49231735.7030304@allums.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] slrngi5t3e.ihf.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>
References: <[🔎] 200811171447.07622.aboelens@engin.umass.edu> <[🔎] slrngi3od6.ihf.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com> <[🔎] 4922E8C9.1020201@allums.com> <[🔎] slrngi5t3e.ihf.nospam@sshway.ssh.pusling.com>

Sune Vuorela wrote:

On 2008-11-18, Mark Allums <mark@allums.com> wrote:
the effort, however unlikely that may be. Lacking that, 4.1 in unstableand 4.2 in experimental seems worthwhile, freeze or no freeze. (From
That is not one of the options you had to choose from.  uploading 4.2 to
experimental will *replace* 4.1. No matter if it is 4.2final or a
pre-release.

/Sune

Sigh. Yes, of course. Someone said, "this is your last chance toinfluence the decision." I was not trying to be rational; I was tryingto influence the decision. Sorry to disappoint you.


Mark Allums

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: KDE 4.2
  - From: Ritesh Raj Sarraf <rrs@researchut.com>

References:
- KDE 4.2
  - From: Arnout Boelens <aboelens@engin.umass.edu>
- Re: KDE 4.2
  - From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>
- Re: KDE 4.2
  - From: Mark Allums <mark@allums.com>
- Re: KDE 4.2
  - From: Sune Vuorela <nospam@vuorela.dk>

Prev by Date: Re: KDE 4.2
Next by Date: Re: KDE 4.2
Previous by thread: Re: KDE 4.2
Next by thread: Re: KDE 4.2
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread