[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: KDE 3.2 Progress

On Monday 16 February 2004 08:26 am, Bruce Miller wrote:
> On February 16, 2004 10:34, Robert Tilley wrote:
> > I have to comment on the seemingly logical contradiction of KDE 3.2.0
> > existing in the "stable" distribution while missing from the
> > "unstable" or "testing" branches.
> >
> > I will have to give the KDE Team minus points on this one.  While we
> > all greatly appreciate the improvements in KDE 3.2, having to run
> > stable (with the corresponding lack of software) is an impediment.
> > --
> > Comments are appreciated,
> I am sympathetic to your point of view but cannot entirely agree.
> The main hold-up to getting 3.2 into unstable is getting 3.1.5 out of
> unstable. Remember that Debian requires that its packages work on
> eleven different architectures; something that (we) users of i386
> sometimes overlook.

Do we _have_ to have KDE 3.1 working in platforms like M68000?  I doubt that 
old chip family has the horsepower to handle KDE.

Attachment: pgpOJzuCdWLOQ.pgp
Description: signature

Reply to: