Re: Debian bugs belong to the Debian BTS
On Thursday 23 October 2003 18:08, Hendrik Sattler wrote:
> If an app crashes, the app is broken. End of discussion :)
> If the app uses a lib that crashes itself, it is also the apps developer
> rsponsibility to solve the problem with the libs' developer and not tell
> the user to do so.
That's not correct. Debian sid uses gcc-3.3 as default, which in some versions
used in Debian was known to produce bad code leading to hangs and others.
Plus, a lot of time has been spent on gcc errors during KDE packaging.
It may be a correct classicication to say that a crashing app is broken, but
that's not the end of the discussion.
If bugs in released packages occur only with certain compiler versions or
(more likely) wirth certain versions of libraries, it's useful to think about
repackaging. This does not solve the bug in the upstream code, but it
certainly can solve a bug in a debian package. Thus, an application failure
is not the end of the discussion about _packaging_.
But... The KDE crypto packages' history is really not the gleamy side of
Debian. An easy tool like pinentry and so much Terror about it. I bet, more
than a hundred times of mailing list/newsgroup lines more than the program
has code lines have been written about this :(
> Then why releasing the program at all. Either I am interested in it to
> proper work elsewhere, too, or I shouldn't release it.
True for woody and sarge, mostly true for sid. But being the unstable
distribution of Debian, sid sometimes will carry packages with partially
broken functionality, mostly in cases of dependency conflicts. One look at
the history of KDE releases proves this, but this is definitely not a
"Release Early, Release Often" . That's why. But nothing of that belongs
into woody/sarge - sid is only for the brave ;)
But really, all the Terror about KDE crypto smells like the good old FUD of
american crypto laws. I think too many people still don't trust the US
government in the area of cryptology enough to even touch crypto packages
. At least a lot of outdated information from the time when RSA was
restricted under ITAR (International Traffic in Arms Regulations)  and
parts of the community reacted with public disobedience  and some went to
court because of RSA printed on disc cases or similar.
Most of that is history since 1999, but the USA still have not regained the
"Those who would give up essential liberty, to purchase a little temporary
safety, deserve neither liberty nor safety." - Benjamin Franklin