On Mon, Mar 17, 2003 at 02:11:57AM -0700, Ben Burton scrawled: > Hmm, on retrospect the kde-extras idea seems questionable to me - it will > take a lot of effort to keep it current and to ensure that all the apps > it depends on are in good working order. Yeah, I personally think kde-extras is far too big a package, and that it needs to be split up into tasks, like I said in my post. I did, however, omit -devel. This IMHO should be done, as below. > Though I'd still like to see kdbg, kprof and kcachegrind in the -devel > metapackage if it will be made, for reasons outlined in my previous > post. :) d -- Daniel Stone <dstone@trinity.unimelb.edu.au> Developer, Trinity College, University of Melbourne
Attachment:
pgphzpWhSrGyh.pgp
Description: PGP signature