Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)

To: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>
Cc: debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Feb 2003 20:42:27 -0700
Message-id: <[🔎] 20030227034227.GA16342@gluck.debian.org>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 200302261744.02012.michael@linuxmagic.com>
References: <[🔎] 200302270016.54058.bab@debian.org> <[🔎] 200302262344.58883.nolden@kde.org> <[🔎] 20030227000319.GA24746@earthlink.net> <[🔎] 200302261744.02012.michael@linuxmagic.com>

> If it doens't compile using just -dev then it is a 
> app that needs to be fixed, and they can help the debian movement by sorting 
> this out :)

Indeed, they *can* help.  I don't believe it's debian's place to force
them to.

Ben. :)

Reply to:

References:
- Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ben Burton <bab@debian.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Ralf Nolden <nolden@kde.org>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: "Ivan E. Moore II" <rkrusty@earthlink.net>
- Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
  - From: Michael Peddemors <michael@linuxmagic.com>

Prev by Date: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Next by Date: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Previous by thread: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Next by thread: Re: Rethinking Qt headers (should the header packages be recombined?)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread