Re: Qt Changes ahead - Info for package maintainers + developers
Ralf Nolden <email@example.com> writes:
> Qt 3 development requires (or should require) libqt-mt.so, Qt 2 development is
> using libqt.so. Therefore you can develop for Qt 2 and Qt 3 at the same time
> if the header file installations allow this (which is only possible by naming
> the include path to the version number, which should be prefered anyway).
> You'll see that this all has a master plan if you have a closer look at
> things :-)
What about the conflict that Qt2 requires libpng2-dev (and should
continue to do so for binary compatibility, imho) and Qt3 requires
Daniel Schepler "Please don't disillusion me. I
firstname.lastname@example.org haven't had breakfast yet."
-- Orson Scott Card