Re: kpilot and kalendar/kab conduits
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Am Donnerstag, 14. November 2002 02:09 schrieb Jason 'vanRijn' Kasper:
> I'm just curious, is anyone using kpilot and its conduits for
> kalendar/kab with recent builds of kde? I stopped looking at using this
> as an option a LONG time ago, as it was always marked as alpha-quality,
> and seems to still be so, and never actually worked for me.
The conduits from kde 2.2.2 didn't work for me, either. In kde 3.0 the
calendar conduit was completely broken, but starting from 3.0.1 it was
improved, and with 3.0.3 or 3.1 it should work fine now. I've been using it
for some months now, and I think it really works now (if it doesn't work for
you, please tell me, since I'm the current maintainer of the conduit).
As far as the addressbook conduit is concerned: Between kde 3.0.x and 3.1 the
conduit was completely rewritten (again by me), so that it now uses kde's
addressbook library libkabc. It works great for me, too. Only the categories
are messed up sometimes. I will fix this when I find some sparetime, but that
will probably take several more weeks.
> Is anyone using this combination successfully now? Is there hope for
> the near future that this will work as well as evolution does now?
As I said, I use kpilot to sync the calendar/todo, addressbook, AvantGo and
the memos (to knotes). So far, it is working reasonably well.
I actually tried syncing with gnome-pilot some time ago, and it completely
messed up the addressbook on my clie (duplicate entries, multi-day events
lost the recurrence etc.).
Reinhold
- --
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
DI Reinhold Kainhofer, Graz, Austria
email: reinhold@kainhofer.com, http://reinhold.kainhofer.com/
* Mathematics Department, Graz University of Technology
* Theoretical Physics Department, University of Graz
- ------------------------------------------------------------------
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (GNU/Linux)
iD8DBQE908BKTqjEwhXvPN0RArntAJ9DvP03vg/YMrFgQUg3Wr39exhgOACdHL1w
onWJ+R7kzi6drTJaWPdsxho=
=t2NQ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: