Re: KDE 3.1

To: David Pashley <david@parguild.co.uk>, debian-kde@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: KDE 3.1
From: Nicolai Guba <nicolai@btinternet.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Jul 2002 12:14:25 +0100
Message-id: <200207161214.25134.nicolai@btinternet.com>
In-reply-to: <20020716103735.GA16924@parguild.co.uk>
References: <1026508247.7661.5.camel@jonxp> <E17UIFm-0000kW-00@localhost> <20020716103735.GA16924@parguild.co.uk>

On Tuesday 16 July 2002 11:37 am, David Pashley wrote:
> But kde 3.1 packages are mostly buildable from CVS if you have the time
> to fix the added, moved or removed files.

I've just done this.  But many of the builds fail.  A lot of autoconf stuff 
needs fixing too.  It's enough for a basic system though ;)

Shame dpkg cannot handle 'test' installs.  Ie something that would allow 
packages like kde2 and kde3.1 beta to co-exist.

Then again, which packaging system does?

--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-kde-request@lists.debian.org
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmaster@lists.debian.org

Reply to:

References:
- KDE 3.1
  - From: Jon Ellis <jon.ellis@libertydistribution.com>
- Re: KDE 3.1
  - From: Ben Burton <benb@acm.org>
- Re: KDE 3.1
  - From: David Pashley <david@parguild.co.uk>

Prev by Date: Re: patch for wine to compile against new libarts
Next by Date: Re: KDE 3.1
Previous by thread: Re: KDE 3.1
Next by thread: Re: KDE 3.1
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread