On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 06:33:53PM +0000, Colin Watson wrote: > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 12:20:01PM -0600, Chris Cheney wrote: > > On Tue, Mar 05, 2002 at 11:09:39AM -0600, Colin Watson wrote: > > > Is anybody planning to adopt kde-i18n? It currently has its maintainer > > > field set to the QA group, but I'm not sure it's something we should > > > really be touching - it recently acquired a grave bug, too. > > > > I intend to adopt it with KDE 3, but I can do it earlier if needed. > > Depends how serious #136896 actually is, I suppose. I know Ivan's builds > for potato have contained kdelibs3 - was kdelibs2g used much by that > time? > > If it would help take load off you and you don't mind, I can QA-upload > kde-i18n with extra 'Replaces: kdelibs2g' fields where appropriate. One reason why I never adopted it was that the source was *frigging* *huge*. -- Daniel Stone <daniel@sfarc.net> <ilse> well it must be nice being a lemming, at least you're convinced you're goning the right way
Attachment:
pgp92RxlkMe6U.pgp
Description: PGP signature