[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Athlon optimized KDE build

On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 05:39:05PM +1100, Daniel Stone wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 28, 2002 at 02:53:16AM +0200, Eray Ozkural wrote:
> > On Wednesday 27 February 2002 21:36, Daniel Stone wrote:
> > > I will not provide any form of support whatsoever for these packages.
> > 
> > And these are not packages btw, it would be just a large tarball.
> Oh! How wonderfully useful! If you're going to do it, at least do it
> right. A leet "KDE hacker" (it may be useful to note the laughter from
> KDE upstream whenever your name is invoked, not to mention the response
> from Debian) like yourself would know that it takes one line in
> debian/rules to enable Athlon optimizations.

Oh, and I've just been handed some very amusing news. Your packages are
K6-optimized, not Athlon-optimized.

K6-"optimized" builds run about 15% slower on Athlons than i386 builds.
In this case, I have only one thing to say:

No, make that two:
Don't use exa's packa^Wtarballs, because they're worse than useless.
Build it yourself if you're that desperate. Would *you* leave your KDE
in exa's hands? Hahahahahahahahahahahaha. Hahahahahahahahahaha. Haha.

Daniel Stone						    <daniel@sfarc.net>
<asuffield> Viiru: compared to me, everybody is big
<asuffield> heck, there are hamsters that weigh more than me

Attachment: pgpEkGfX8SUq7.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply to: