[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: the non-existence of libglib1.3-12

On Sun, Feb 24, 2002 at 12:48:50PM +0000, Simon Hepburn wrote:
> The sensible thing to do would be to build against the stable branch of 
> libglib (1.2). I suspect this is what Chris is doing ... hence the delay.
> Simon.

libarts apparently needs 1.3 so I removed support for it entirely in the
new upload I did last week.  When it finally goes into the archive arts
will no longer depend on glib at all.


Reply to: