Re: qt embedded devel
On Wed, Jul 25, 2001 at 03:10:10AM -0600, Ivan E. Moore II wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 24, 2001 at 12:44:53PM +0200, Maximilian Reiss wrote:
> > why to qt embedded devel and qt (normal) devel exclude each other?
> > Aktually on a i386 machine it would make more sense to have qt (normal) in
> > the usual path and the qt embedded is a special path, so it would be possible
> > to devel on one machine for qt and also for qt embedded (with setting the
> > path before compiling).
>
> because Debian is not just i386 and because of things like FHS.
Eh?
I don't understand - why does this make a difference? Embedded will
usually be used for cross-compiling, not for the main system. It has
nothing to do with FHS. You'd want Embedded to live in its own tree
if you're doing development with it. I think the embedded packages
are of very little use if they exclude all the other Qt devel
packages - unless you never do development with desktop Qt and
embedded Qt on the same machine.
--
Michael Ashton <data@ieee.org>
----
"My attitude toward progress has passed from antagonism to boredom. I
have long ceased to argue with people who prefer Thursday to
Wednesday because it is Thursday."
-- G. K. Chesterton
Reply to: