[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: How to handle ckeditor5?



Le mercredi 16 avril 2025, 13:36:15 heure d’été d’Europe centrale Andrew 
Ruthven a écrit :
> Hey,
> 
> I'm in the Request Tracker (RT) Maintainers Team. The next major version of
> Request Tracker will change from ckeditor4 to ckeditor5. As upstream ships a
> minified version of ckeditor, we currently add the matching version of the
> source for ckeditor4 and compile the minified file using ckbuilder.
> 
> I've looked at the ckeditor v5 releases, it appears they only release it as
> minified code[0]. To create minified code, it appears to require either
> their web interface, or to use npm. ckbuilder, which we've been using so far
> doesn't appear to support v5 and they're going to drop webpack support
> soon.
> 
> While I see that the RT upstreams are aware of this, and have engaged with
> the ckeditor devs on finding a path forward[1], they don't yet have a
> solution implemented.
> 
> >From a naive search of Debian packages for files named "ckeditor", I can't
> 
> find any that have v5[2]. Searching our mailing lists, the only relevant
> post I can find is a call for help on packaging ckeditor5, with no
> response[3].
> 
> As I'm not really a JavaScript person, I'm wondering if there are opinions
> from people on this list on how to handle this situation.

We need help here

It it hard to build but could be done

we could help here

It need first to create ckeditor5-dev package

Bastien
> 
> Fingers crossed,
> Andrew
> 
> PS, I'm not on this mailing list, please Cc replies to me.
> 
> [0]
> https://ckeditor.com/docs/ckeditor5/latest/getting-started/installation/self
> -hosted/quick-start.html#installing-ckeditor-5-from-a-zip-file [1]
> https://github.com/ckeditor/ckeditor5/issues/17779
> [2] Which I'm sure you're all aware is a bit scary.
> [3] 4340401.m3tPKCyck7@portable-bastien -
> https://lists.debian.org/debian-js/2024/10/msg00006.html

Attachment: signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.


Reply to: