[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Remaining task packages ...



Each time I face our "packaged" list I'm dismayed at my categories.  First
off, I hate "misc" categories and we have at least one of those (see
"Education" top level category which is perhaps more aptly named
"Education - Misc").  But I am equally uncomfortable with categories with
only one or two things in them.  So I have therefore attempted to build
the junior-* meta packages using a "most populated first" rule of thumb.
That would make these four the next on my list to create.

    junior-sound
	Depends: bplay, cdtool, grip, timidity, vorbis-tools, xmms

    junior-puzzle
	Depends: codebreaker, gbatnav, gtans, lmemory, rocks-n-diamonds, xjig

    junior-system-tools
	Depends: lavaps, mc, xcruise

    junior-3d-games
	Depends: armagetron, gltron, tuxracer

Followed by these rather poor or not-well-populated categories:

    junior-coloring
	Depends: gimp, xpaint

    junior-education
	Depends: gcompris, ssystem

    junior-card-games
	Depends: ace-of-penguins

    junior-simulation-games
	Depends: freeciv

    junior-text-games
	Depends: bsdgames, moon-buggy | moon-buggy-esd

    junior-network-games
	Depends: xblast

    junior-internet-tools
	Depends: mozilla

I am certain if I combed the list archives I could supplement at least the
games meta packages with some more.  And I think we do need something in
the way of junior-programming which is not represented here at all.  Some
ideas on that were tossed around and I'll have to see what I can come up
with out of the list archives as well.  Can anyone help me out with the
rest?  Start with the "poor or not-well-populated" list and feed me some
suggestions.

Thanks,
Ben
-- 
    nSLUG       http://www.nslug.ns.ca      synrg@sanctuary.nslug.ns.ca
    Debian      http://www.debian.org       synrg@debian.org
[ pgp key fingerprint = 7F DA 09 4B BA 2C 0D E0  1B B1 31 ED C6 A9 39 4F ]
[ gpg key fingerprint = 395C F3A4 35D3 D247 1387  2D9E 5A94 F3CA 0B27 13C8 ]



Reply to: