Re: shouldn't openjdk-11-jre have maintainer as debian-java@lists.debian.org instead of openjdk@lists.launchpad.net and openjfx
Hi Shirish,
On 23/08/2018 16:09, shirish शिरीष wrote:
> Wouldn't it better to have the maintainer be reflected to
> debian-java@lists.debian.org perhaps ? IIRC there used to be an alioth
> list which used to look at the maintenance before.
debian-java@lists.debian.org is a discussion list. Using it in the
maintainer field is undesirable since it would flood the list with many
notifications. That why we use a separate list as maintainer
(pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org for the Java packages, and
openjdk@lists.launchpad.net for OpenJDK).
> Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org>
> since the move to salsa. I have not been able to even seen the
> pipermail at https://alioth-lists-archive.debian.net/pipermail/ so
> it's all a bit confusing.
Maybe you are looking for this?
https://alioth-lists.debian.net/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/pkg-java-maintainers
> Lastly, does anybody have any ideas of the openjfx 11 roadmap, there
> are early access builds at
> https://wiki.openjdk.java.net/display/OpenJFX/Download
There are blocking issues to resolve first, OpenJFX 11 requires a more
recent version of Gradle than the one in sid currently.
Emmanuel Bourg
Reply to: