[Date Prev][Date Next] [Thread Prev][Thread Next] [Date Index] [Thread Index]

Re: Problem using mh_make on ice4j



On Tue, 17 Jul 2018 at 19:28, Eugene Simakin <eugene.smkn@yandex.ru> wrote:
Sorry, I didn't manage to make it.
 
But I see where is the problem.
The problem is here:
In pom.xml: This plugin cannot be found in the Debian Maven repository. Ignore this plugin?  org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:maven-plugin:null
[y/N] > y
You can't ignore that maven plugin because it actually makes bundle (or handles packaging type = bundle).

Ah, of course, sorry, i focused on the wrong dead end.

In pom.xml: This plugin cannot be found in the Debian Maven repository. Ignore this plugin?  org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:maven-plugin:null
[y/N] > n
> dpkg --search /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/*/*
dpkg failed to execute successfully
> apt-file search /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin
Found /usr/share/maven-repo/org/apache/felix/maven-bundle-plugin/3.5.0/maven-bundle-plugin-3.5.0.pom in libmaven-bundle-plugin-java
> dpkg --search /usr/share/java/maven-bundle-plugin.jar
dpkg failed to execute successfully
> apt-file search /usr/share/java/maven-bundle-plugin.jar
apt-file failed to execute successfully
[error] Cannot resolve Maven dependency org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:maven-plugin:null. If you know a package that contains a compatible dependency,
try to enter a substitution rule of the form s/groupId/newGroupId/ s/artifactId/newArtifactId/ jar s/version/newVersion/ here:

> maven-bundle-plugin
Your rule doesn't seem to apply on org.apache.felix:maven-bundle-plugin:maven-plugin:nullPlease enter a substitution rule of the form s/groupId/newGroupId/ s/artifactId/newArtifactId/ jar s/version/newVersion/ here,or press <Enter> to give up
>

Could you give me an overview of the problem here? I don't understand why it is looking for "maven-bundle-plugin.jar" while the package libmaven-bundle-plugin-java should ship hat is needed.

Thanks

--
Samuel Henrique <samueloph>

Reply to: