Hello Felix, I agree that the changes are made into a single patch. Now that no human being is actively maintaining this package, I think it is effectively orphaned. pkg-java team is unable to be responsible for the package because nobody *is* pkg-java. Changing the maintainer to Debian QA Group does not seem incorrect to me. However, I'm curious about the situation when someone wants to upload a simple change to an orphaned package. Do people refrain from it or they simply do a non-maintainer upload? Felix Natter 於 2017/9/5 上午3:35 寫道: > 殷啟聰 | Kai-Chung Yan <seamlikok@gmail.com> writes: > >> Hello Natter, > hi Kai, > thanks for the reply. > > s/Natter/Felix/g ;-) (my first name is Felix) > >> Since it's just one commit, I suggest you put it as a patch in >> `debian/patches`. When someone is updating the package to 2.5.0, she >> can just remove it. > There is already a 2.4.8-2 in the git pipeline (unreleased) by Miguel > Landaeta (CC): > https://anonscm.debian.org/cgit/pkg-java/groovy.git > > In the corresponding bug for 2.4.8-2 (#871857) Miguel says: > > "I removed myself from uploaders list and prepared a tentative QA upload > but I didn't upload it to the archive since the resulting package would > be in violation of Debian Policy (§3.3 and §5.6.3). I'd appreciate if > somebody else can step in as maintainer." > > Policy §5.6.3 says: > "This is normally an optional field, but if the Maintainer control field > names a group of people and a shared email address, the Uploaders field > must be present and must contain at least one human with their personal > email address." > > --> groovy currently only has: > Maintainer: Debian Java Maintainers <pkg-java-maintainers@lists.alioth.debian.org> > (no Uploader:) > which seems to violate §5.6.3. So how can we make a policy-compliant > team upload without becoming maintainer (I'd like to avoid taking over > groovy maintainership if possible)? > > Shall we set > Maintainer: Debian QA Group <packages@qa.debian.org> > according to Policy §3.3, even if we usually do team uploads? > > Other than that: @Miguel, @Emmanuel, @Kai: do you agree to make a simple > 2.4.8-2 release with Miguel's changes only adding that patch? > > Thanks and Best Regards,
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature