On Sat, 01 Jul 2017 18:14:38 +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: > >>> do we still have to do this > >>> search&replace dance in debian/rules? > >> You mean the cmap copying back and forth? > >> Probably not (see below). > >> And it looks like the whole repackaging needs an update: > > Yes, I suspect it might be easier to start from scratch. > The current get-orig-source target worked for me. Yup but as can be seen in the output I pasted, there's a pattern in d/copyright's Files-Excluded which doesn't match anymore. (Exactly the cmap files which appear again in d/rules). > I just wasn't sure > what problem you had to solve back then. The code from Adobe appears to > be free software, so it wasn't clear to me what you wanted to achieve, > especially the Built-Using stuff. Is it still needed? I think this can all be dropped, if the package builds without it. Back then, the upstream tarball shipped some non-free files which we stripped but since they were needed during the build we copied equivalents around from other packages. If this sounds a bit vague it might be because, according to the git history, this started in 2007 :) > > So, regarding the update, given that tika and jabref are the only > > r-deps, and that tika is probably able to move forward, what do people > > think about either moving the existing src:libpdfbox-java packages into > > libpdfbox1-java or uploading PDFBox 2.x as libpdfbox2-java? > I can live with another package (that means there are eight new > dependencies for pdfsam at the moment). Then I go for > src:libpdfbox2-java and drop the libjempbox-java binary package for this > source package. Sounds good, thanks. Cheers, gregor -- .''`. https://info.comodo.priv.at/ - Debian Developer https://www.debian.org : :' : OpenPGP fingerprint D1E1 316E 93A7 60A8 104D 85FA BB3A 6801 8649 AA06 `. `' Member of VIBE!AT & SPI, fellow of the Free Software Foundation Europe `- NP: Supertramp: My Kind Of Lady
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital Signature