> Felix Natter <fnatter@gmx.net> writes: > > Dear Java Team, > >> I am looking for someone to review my "insubstantial" package": >> >> * Package name : insubstantial (aka flamingo/substance/trident) >> Version : 7.3+dfsg2-1 >> Upstream Author : Kirill Grouchnikov >> * URL : https://github.com/Insubstantial/insubstantial >> * License : BSD-3-clause >> Section : java > > could you please consider reviewing this package? > >> I am not filing an RFS bug yet, because we need to upload fixed r-deps >> as well (see below), and once the package is ok, I will port the changes >> as 7.3+dfsg1-1 to alioth. >> >> The current (temporary) VCS location is: >> https://github.com/fnatter/insubstantial-debian >> >> (I also uploaded to mentors.d.n. for easy access: >> http://mentors.debian.net/package/insubstantial) Hi Felix, I have recently been looking at the package from a copyright perspective, but just realized that I'm not sure I understand the plan for the package/transition. It currently builds the following binary packages, all (or at least most) of which are already in archive owned by other source packages: libflamingo-java libflamingo-java-doc liblaf-plugin-java liblaf-plugin-java-doc liblaf-widget-java liblaf-widget-java-doc substance substance-doc substance-flamingo substance-flamingo-doc substance-swingx substance-swingx-doc libtrident-java libtrident-java-doc First are you confident that we want to use the insubstantial project as upstream for all of these? (And what makes you confident?) Second, will unsubstantial be able to provide JARs with the right maven metadata, etc. for other/new r-deps? It seems like we're lumping the version numbers of all of these JARs into one - 7.3. Finally, if we do move forward with this, we'll need to remove the source packages for all of the above. What's the motivation for the big change? Thanks! tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature