On 05/22/2015 01:45 PM, Miguel Landaeta wrote: > severity 786553 serious > thanks > > On Fri, May 22, 2015 at 10:01:00PM +0200, Markus Koschany wrote: >> On 22.05.2015 21:26, Felix Natter wrote: >> [...] >>> Ok, so I don't need to do anything to keep jffi 1.2 from entering >>> testing? >> >> No, this package is completely broken in sid. See >> >> https://packages.qa.debian.org/j/jffi.html > > It hasn't migrated to testing just because this package has not been built > for all the archs. > > I raised the severity of 786553 to prevent the migration to testing and > avoid this breakage there. > > Unfortunately, the road to update jruby and their dependencies has > been very slow due to several circumstances, so some packages in sid > will be broken for some time. Does anyone think it's worthwhile to update jruby 1.5 to build against jffi 1.2 as an interim measure? I think we still need jnr-posix to be accepted into unstable to make that work, but it should allow other gradle-based packages to continue to build. Cheers, tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature