Re: putting bouncycastle 1.49 into backports?
On 21/01/14 11:27, Emmanuel Bourg wrote:
> Le 21/01/2014 11:09, Daniel Pocock a écrit :
>
>> When you say creating separate binary packages, do you mean creating
>> packages that have the version in the name such as
>>
>> libbcprov1.49-java.deb (1.49)
>>
>> libbcprov-java.deb (existing 1.44 in wheezy)
> Yes exactly. And the package would have to be slightly modified to not
> conflict with libbcprov-java (by renaming the jars in /usr/share/java
> and changing the version of the Maven artifacts in /usr/share/maven-repo).
>
Based on Ingo's reply, I think this is what we would have to do because
they definitely need that version in wheezy-backports if Jitsi is to be
backported
Reply to: