On 08/04/2012 01:48 PM, Vincent Fourmond wrote: > Hi, > > On Sat, Aug 4, 2012 at 4:37 PM, Damien Raude-Morvan <drazzib@drazzib.com> wrote: >>> Le 04/08/2012 09:59, Thomas Koch a écrit : >>>> do you think we should change the java policy and relax the requirement >>>> to >>>> install java libraries to /usr/share/java in favour of >>>> /usr/share/maven-repo? >>>> >>>> At least I'd like to see a very strong recommends to install to /u/s/m-r. >>>> I >>>> feel like having filled a dozen bugs against java libraries that did not >>>> honour >>>> the debian maven repo but on which I depended. >>> >>> I don't think we should add in our policy a strong dependency on a build >>> system and the paths it expects. It used to be ant, it is now Maven, it >>> might change in the future. >>> >>> I would prefer to keep /usr/share/java. It is not tied to a specific tool. >> >> >> I also support this: /usr/share/maven-repo is only an addition to >> /usr/share/java and not a replacement. >> >> IIRC, Debian Java Policy actually require versionned JAR (ie. real file) to >> be installed into /usr/share/java and we should keep this. > > That said, nothing stops requesting or requiring packages to install > versioned or versionless symlinks in /usr/share/maven-repo. > > BTW, why /usr/share/maven-repo isn't simply a symlink to > /usr/share/java ? Would it break something ? (I'm maven-naive). /usr/share/maven-repo has a more complicated layout than /usj, so a simply symlink won't do. I like to think of the maven-repo as a namespace/catalog, or view, on top of the actual library of JARs found in /usj. +1 for keeping the actual JAR files in /u/s/java. I think this makes it easier to find them (for non-mavenized toolsets). But also +1 for Thomas' proposed policy update regarding JARs available in public maven repositories and making those artifacts available in /usr/share/maven-repo. tony
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature