Re: RFS: uddi4j

[Jakub Adam <jakub.adam@ktknet.cz>]

Hi Niels,

> I see this one has fallen through the cracks and probably have not been
> sponsored (like wsil4j, which depends on this).  Assuming these are
> still valid

Yes, both RFS are still relevant.

> and needed,

These libs are required by Eclipse Web Tools which I have in my plan for
packaging.

> I would strongly prefer that uddi4j was moved to a git repository first.

So would I :) Moved to [1].

> Also, I think that given that Stephan Michels has not committed since
> 2006, it is safe to remove Stephan from the Uploaders list.

Removed.

Regards

Jakub

[1] http://anonscm.debian.org/gitweb/?p=pkg-java/uddi4j.git