Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental
- To: Mathieu Malaterre <mathieu.malaterre@gmail.com>
- Cc: arbtt@packages.debian.org, freemind@packages.debian.org, scilab@packages.debian.org, ognl@packages.debian.org, libjlatexmath-java@packages.debian.org, publican@packages.debian.org, libspring-ldap-java@packages.debian.org, gpsbabel@packages.debian.org, jeuclid@packages.debian.org, umlet@packages.debian.org, libspring-security-2.0-java@packages.debian.org, erlang@packages.debian.org, doxia-sitetools@packages.debian.org, uimaj@packages.debian.org, jaxe@packages.debian.org, doxia@packages.debian.org, Debian Java List <debian-java@lists.debian.org>, Calixte Denizet <Calixte.Denizet@ac-rennes.fr>
- Subject: Re: Uploading fop 1.0 to experimental
- From: Sylvestre Ledru <sylvestre@debian.org>
- Date: Fri, 30 Jul 2010 18:25:58 +0200
- Message-id: <1280507158.27645.11317.camel@korcula.inria.fr>
- In-reply-to: <AANLkTikS2H6LG5ul0oq4GajY5-KIOtSSVcoUNLQzwgm1@mail.gmail.com>
- References: <gbouxdp291b2elbayUYAxe124vaj_firegpg@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTile5Dylu7McCAObKWWQKZhFswY1gxJxHhAYNsvL@mail.gmail.com> <AANLkTikS2H6LG5ul0oq4GajY5-KIOtSSVcoUNLQzwgm1@mail.gmail.com>
Le samedi 17 juillet 2010 à 22:58 +0200, Mathieu Malaterre a écrit :
> Dear package maintainer,
>
> I have uploaded fop 1.0 to experimental:
>
> http://packages.qa.debian.org/f/fop/news/20100717T204721Z.html
>
> I did not make xmlgraphics-commons 1.4 a requirement, the package is
> available on mentors (I am a DM so I cannot upload xmlgraphics-commons
> to experimental):
>
> http://mentors.debian.net/debian/pool/main/x/xmlgraphics-commons/
>
> Please test if you can, and please do report any issue you may find.
Upstream developer of jlatexmath (C/C of this email) reported some
issues with the version 1.0 of FOP.
He says [1] that this release has some issues with the font management
and the way to render images.
jeuclid builds against this version but I haven't been able to test for
now. I will contact upstream about this.
Cheers,
Sylvestre
[1] http://bugzilla.scilab.org/show_bug.cgi?id=7605#c2
Reply to: