Re: RFS: jme - high performance scenegraph based graphics java API
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On 2010-07-04 20:32, Gabriele Giacone wrote:
> Hi Niels,
>
> On 07/04/2010 02:28 AM, Niels Thykier wrote:
>> [...] I am not a DD [...]
> Next month? :)
>
mmm... maybe :)
>> The javadoc is not linking against system javadocs, please link it
>> against the javadoc of the packages it build against (if these provide a
>> javadoc). The doc package should also recommend on the packages
>> providing the javadocs it has linked against.
> Fixed. I should take a look at other packages.
>
Actually you may want to wait a bit. We have been working on upgrading
javahelper to assist you with this task - to be honest with you I am
quite pleased with the result so far.
Keep an eye out for javahelper 0.32
>> Also, the binary packages have a lintian warning (v2.4.2)
>> W: libjme-java: copyright-refers-to-deprecated-bsd-license-file
> Now also lintian 2.4.2 is happy.
>
>> NB: Linking with ant is done by adding <link> tags inside the javadoc.
>> See http://www.debian.org/doc/manuals/debian-java-faq/ch4.html#s4.4 for
>> more info.
>
>> You may also need to add the jars to the classpath of javadoc so it can
>> resolve the classes (not sure if it can do that by a link alone or not).
> I added them to classpath and now javadoc finds all symbols.
>
> What about adding lintian checks for javadoc not linked to system
> javadoc and packages/symbols not found? Does it worth?
>
>
> Thanks for your review.
> Gabriele
I think the problem with the lintian check is that it might be hard to
do without false positives, but it is definitely an idea. Well, it is
possible to check if it reference *a* system installed javadoc, but
checking it is linked against them all is rather difficult (especially
because lintian does not know which libraries have javadocs and which do
not).
~Niels
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/
iQIcBAEBAgAGBQJMMOKbAAoJEE/psYaVpuazLOEQALEdC0vKKGwAn/zmXtaoFoWd
Jshn9wYAdWmBuG231K1Vv2Y3ywEiZGU7HGf1O3yCbOwO6R4AC3+2yAEy4VdDygm8
zq0TxH1c3I+gdB1gAUCIool91HfHZsqcOJtEEHrN0+Hu4AVy0LKRMvuLEu8JJuqd
e/Ik++pnPKpWI7en7UabvWtzdq6+Btul8AWZQIqlaYo7gNKFwaS0M25+n80FNdrH
EU/FRfXT++HAKVfAJhPu42KPfJsJlgezxNXzVICQ7rV6hpIo9bYrY7api0SwGEaK
vvQ5XpN9ZVmjATYlGC2ml701Z9wG8fEf8ApLIS+E3bEFvv8XBB7DMoIqukoO2JAN
SdM74DQoAqrOYrUd6P1IG6bJp5j2EpY1SI1tS4ghPEixj/lYO+P3BmuzEaDjhEC1
1sytAxKfnLo+8R7hqWflka0tSvLZyNHfZ7w6iDYe3MjyMDmrrY+Ar9rMHQuCMesk
gNNit59ZuvvMcXCtgPBug9vEX3jXQhO2Ru3X+nEhkmlQlLRBQF7DJy7g2G8NXVo/
SXHpw6yDLu8IzeEIb3tpHFQSs7nDaj+Akc9WhlDdO2rIjNUTwTPOvuv8VaPjJKEV
WJZOB06MhK4aAvGmeVDHOB3ccJKosiO3cLMGkssaS2bTMkUJUArfqEIbdujvfeYy
Xc4iSCB0yowOWR2kxP8h
=lwOc
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Reply to: