Re: RFS: icu4j-4.2
On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 11:00 PM, Scott Howard <email@example.com> wrote:
> On Mon, Jun 21, 2010 at 2:10 PM, Niels Thykier <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
>> * Removed dependencies on JREs - per the Java Policy this is no
>> longer required.
> Do we not need to depend on default-jre-headless for libraries? Or is
> it optional? I don't see anything in the policy saying that it was
> required to - so when is it good to include the dependency? Thank you.
Earlier policy (and a very outdated one, but that was reworked only
recently) mandated that libraries should depend on an appropriate java
If my memory serves me right, only *programs* should depend on the
java runtime they need to run, but not libraries.