Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)

To: debian-java@lists.debian.org
Subject: Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
From: Torsten Werner <mail.twerner@googlemail.com>
Date: Fri, 04 Jun 2010 18:01:35 +0200
Message-id: <[🔎] 4C09235F.8040303@googlemail.com>
In-reply-to: <[🔎] 20100604153434.GA3210@miguel.cc>
References: <[🔎] 20100604153434.GA3210@miguel.cc>

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

Am 04.06.2010 17:34, schrieb Miguel Landaeta:
> By now, IMHO a library only version is useful, since some components of the
> Spring Framework 3.0 link with EclipseLink.

... and some of its dependencies are useful without eclipse. Thanks for
packaging them.

Cheers,
Torsten
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.10 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/

iEYEARECAAYFAkwJI18ACgkQfY3dicTPjsPnmgCeME5N8lOBQBhbT6vDMNZqoquq
VCQAmwbHV5atkEfL67ZM4b7T+IxoDjny
=nXpG
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

Reply to:

Follow-Ups:
- Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
  - From: Niels Thykier <niels@thykier.net>

References:
- Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
  - From: Miguel Landaeta <miguel@miguel.cc>

Prev by Date: Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
Next by Date: Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
Previous by thread: Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
Next by thread: Re: RFS: eclipselink (new package, needed to package Spring Framework 3.0)
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread