On Fri Dec 11 05:59, Matthias Klose wrote: > I would prefer to see gjdoc being removed for the release, if possible. > for the packages build-depending it for now, just remove it from the > b-d's and make sure that javadoc is used instead of gjdoc. If for some > reason, you need it explicitely, maybe b-d on gcj-jdk | gjdoc. The list > of packages are: > > aspectj babel jaminid jesd jmdns libcsv-java libjibx-java mina trilead-ssh2 weirdx And the reason that my packages depend on gjdoc is for dh_javadoc, which is not provided by anything else. However, I think it would be better to move that to javahelper (and fix it up in the mean time, since it's a bit shonky anyway) I can do that, and migrate jsed, libcsv-java, trilead-ssh2 and weirdx, which due to a bug I found and fixed in dh_javadoc I suspect of being the only packages using it. If someone wants to file a bug against them and/or javahelper about this then I'll be more likely to remember (-: Matt -- Matthew Johnson
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature